Categories
Coal Energy News Wind

Investment in Hydrogen Innovation Could Shift to France and Portugal Due to Potential Tax Extension

Repsol, a leading energy company, may redirect its planned 1.5 billion euros investment in hydrogen innovation to France or Portugal if Spain decides to extend a windfall tax on energy companies, according to Chairman Antonio Brufau. The Spanish Socialist Party and their coalition partner, the left-wing Sumar party, recently agreed to extend and revamp windfall taxes on banks and energy firms, which have already generated 2.9 billion euros for the treasury this year.

Brufau expressed concerns about the potential impact of the tax extension on Repsol’s hydrogen investment plans, emphasizing the importance of fiscal and juridical stability. He warned that if Spain imposes a hydrogen tax that other countries do not have, it would likely lead Repsol to consider investing in hydrogen projects in Portugal or France instead.

Previously, Repsol’s Chief Executive Josu Jon Imaz also voiced his concerns about the tax extension, highlighting its detrimental effects on local companies while favoring energy importers. In fact, Repsol has taken legal action against the government regarding the tax, although their request for an injunction was rejected by Spain’s High Court earlier this year.

The uncertainty surrounding the windfall tax extension has already prompted Repsol to freeze a 200 million euros hydrogen project in the Basque Country. The company’s hesitation to proceed with the project in Spain demonstrates the significant influence of tax policies on investment decisions within the energy sector.

As the global energy landscape shifts towards cleaner and more sustainable sources, countries must strike a balance between promoting domestic innovation and investment while also creating a conducive environment for the energy industry to thrive. The potential tax extension in Spain raises questions about the country’s commitment to fostering hydrogen innovation and attracting energy investment.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1. What is a windfall tax?

A windfall tax is a tax imposed on businesses or individuals that experience an unexpected increase in financial gains. It is typically levied when there is a significant surge in profits above what is considered normal. Windfall taxes are often temporary measures implemented to address public concerns about excessive profits in certain industries.

2. Why is Repsol considering investing in hydrogen?

Repsol recognizes the increasing importance of hydrogen as a clean energy source and is exploring investments in hydrogen innovation. Hydrogen has the potential to play a crucial role in decarbonizing various sectors, such as transportation and industry, by providing a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels.

3. How might the tax extension impact Repsol’s hydrogen investment plans?

The potential extension of the windfall tax on energy companies in Spain could create uncertainty and hinder Repsol’s hydrogen investment plans. The company is concerned that the tax could undermine fiscal and juridical stability, making investment in hydrogen projects less attractive in Spain compared to countries without such taxes.

4. What are the implications of Repsol’s potential shift towards France and Portugal?

If Repsol decides to invest in hydrogen projects in France or Portugal instead of Spain, it could result in a missed opportunity for Spain to foster domestic hydrogen innovation and attract investment in the energy sector. This highlights the importance of creating a favorable investment environment and competitive tax policies to encourage companies to invest in sustainable energy solutions domestically.

Categories
Coal Electric Vehicle Energy Gas News Oil Solar Wind

New Leadership and the Push for Renewable Energy at Climate Talks

As the world grapples with the urgent need to combat climate change, there is a growing demand for leaders who prioritize renewable energy over fossil fuels. This demand was recently heightened when an oil executive took over the helm of climate talks, sparking controversy and skepticism. However, this unexpected turn of events has inadvertently brought the issue of renewable energy to the forefront of the conversation.

The new leadership’s appointment has opened up an opportunity to reimagine the approach to combating climate change. While some may view the oil executive’s appointment as a setback, others see it as a chance to challenge the status quo and push for greater renewable energy adoption. By having someone with an extensive background in the fossil fuel industry at the forefront of climate talks, it forces the conversation to directly address the transition towards renewable energy sources.

Despite the initial concerns and backlash, many experts believe that the pressure to eliminate fossil fuel use will only intensify as the consequences of climate change become more apparent. Governments, businesses, and individuals are increasingly recognizing the urgent need to shift towards cleaner energy alternatives.

FAQs:

Q: What is renewable energy?
Renewable energy refers to sources of energy that are naturally replenished, such as solar power, wind power, and geothermal energy. Unlike fossil fuel sources like coal and oil, renewable energy does not produce harmful greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change.

Q: Why is eliminating fossil fuel use important?
Fossil fuel combustion is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, which are the primary cause of climate change. By transitioning to renewable energy sources, we can reduce our carbon footprint and mitigate the effects of global warming.

Q: How can individuals support the shift towards renewable energy?
There are several ways individuals can support the transition to renewable energy. These include investing in solar panels for homes, purchasing electric vehicles, and supporting policies and initiatives that promote renewable energy adoption.

Q: What are the benefits of renewable energy?
Renewable energy offers numerous benefits, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions, improved public health, increased energy independence, job creation, and long-term cost savings.

The ongoing climate talks present an opportunity for meaningful dialogue and action on renewable energy. It is crucial for all stakeholders to come together and find common ground in the pursuit of a sustainable future. While the appointment of an oil executive may have initially caused controversy, it has ultimately placed the spotlight on the urgent need to transition away from fossil fuels and embrace renewable energy solutions.

Categories
Coal Energy Gas Green Energy News Oil

Concerns Mount Over Potential Impact of Trump Presidency on Energy Transition

As the 2024 presidential election draws closer, Donald Trump has emerged as the leading candidate in the Republican party field, outpacing all competition and even leading incumbent Joe Biden in some recent polls. This development has left supporters of the energy transition and Joe Biden’s Green New Deal-based energy policies worried about the potential consequences of a second Trump term.

In a recent report by the Financial Times, concerns were raised about the possibility of Trump targeting the green subsidies and tax breaks included in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). While Trump has not provided specific details about his energy policy, it is expected that he would assemble a team of senior officials and advisors with differing views on energy issues compared to those of the Biden administration.

A new Trump team would likely aim to rebalance the national energy equation by challenging certain IRA policies, particularly those that may be costing the federal budget more than initially estimated. While the green subsidy provisions in the IRA were priced officially at $369 billion over 10 years, some experts suggest that the actual cost could surpass $1 trillion.

In addition to revisiting IRA policies, Trump would also seek to roll back many of the regulatory and permitting measures implemented by the Biden administration that have adversely affected the domestic coal, oil, and gas industries. The breadth and impact of the Biden agenda have even led some analysts to discuss the possibility of “peak oil” demand before 2030. However, some energy experts are concerned that this transition has made the United States increasingly dependent on China for its energy needs, compromising energy security and economic strength.

While critics argue that Biden’s energy agenda resembles the costly and unsuccessful energy plans of countries like Germany and the UK, supporters of the current administration believe it is necessary to address climate change and transition to renewable energy sources. Divisions over energy policy remain, with some industry figures cautioning against linking US energy security too closely with European climate policies.

It is worth noting that Trump’s first term showed his willingness to challenge the status quo and push back against the traditional DC establishment. His approach to energy policy was confrontational, resulting in successful rollbacks of Obama-era regulations and policies. However, achieving similar successes in a second term could be more challenging, given the unpredictable nature of US politics and the potential for limited Republican majorities in Congress.

Furthermore, Trump would also have to consider the impact of repealing certain IRA provisions on major players in the oil and gas industry and other business interests. For example, ExxonMobil’s plans to become a major supplier of lithium could be affected if IRA tax benefits were eliminated.

In conclusion, while a Trump energy agenda would undoubtedly differ significantly from the current Biden agenda, the ultimate outcome would likely be a source of frustration for proponents of either side. The intricacies of American politics, combined with the complexity of energy policy, make it difficult to predict the exact effects of a potential Trump presidency on the energy transition.

FAQ:

Q: What are the concerns regarding a potential second Trump term?
A: Supporters of the energy transition and Joe Biden’s green energy policies are worried Trump may target green subsidies and tax breaks, potentially impacting the progress made towards renewable energy.

Q: How might a new Trump team approach energy policy differently?
A: A new Trump team is expected to challenge certain policies, such as those included in Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, to rebalance the national energy equation.

Q: Why are some energy experts concerned about the Biden agenda?
A: Some experts believe that the Biden agenda could make the US increasingly reliant on China for energy, raising concerns about energy security and economic impact.

Q: How did Trump approach energy policy in his first term?
A: Trump successfully rolled back many Obama-era regulations and policies by issuing executive orders and working with Republican majorities in Congress.

Q: What could be the obstacles to achieving similar successes in a second Trump term?
A: Limited Republican majorities and the unpredictability of US politics could make it challenging to pass legislation supporting Trump’s energy agenda.

Categories
Coal Energy Gas News

The Future of Australia’s Fossil Fuel Developments and Climate Implications

Australia is at a crossroads when it comes to its fossil fuel developments. The government is currently facing critical decisions on whether to approve 30 projects that could potentially result in over 20 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere. These projects primarily involve the export of coal or gas, and if given the green light, could significantly contribute to climate change.

Climate groups have calculated the potential total climate pollution from these developments, taking into account emissions released during production as well as when the fuels are burned for energy in overseas power plants. Shockingly, they estimate that these projects could lead to an additional 22 billion tonnes of CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere. To put this into perspective, it’s roughly ten times greater than Australia’s remaining carbon budget for limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius. It’s also equivalent to approximately 40% of annual global emissions.

While most of the emissions from these developments would be released overseas, thus not counting against Australia under international climate accounting rules, environmental campaigners are quick to point out that the country’s exports would still have a massive impact on global emissions. In other words, the emissions reductions being made domestically are being dwarfed by the emissions generated by Australia’s exports. To truly address the climate crisis, the government needs to tackle both.

FAQ

Q: What is Australia’s remaining carbon budget?

A: Australia’s remaining carbon budget refers to the total amount of carbon dioxide the country can emit within its borders to stay within the 1.5 degrees Celsius global temperature goal.

Q: What are scope 3 emissions?

A: Scope 3 emissions refer to greenhouse gas emissions that occur indirectly as a result of an activity, but are not owned or controlled by the organization undertaking the activity. In this case, it refers to the emissions released when fossil fuels are burned in overseas power plants.

Q: How do fossil fuel exports contribute to climate change?

A: Fossil fuel exports contribute to climate change because when the fuels are burned, they release greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which trap heat and contribute to global warming.

Q: What is the International Energy Agency’s position on fossil fuel phase-out?

A: The International Energy Agency has stated that a rapid phase-out of fossil fuels is necessary to limit global warming and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

In conclusion, Australia must carefully weigh the environmental consequences of its fossil fuel developments. The country’s exports have the potential to significantly contribute to global emissions, undermining the government’s efforts to address the climate crisis domestically. It is crucial for Australia to take a stronger stance on these projects and consider the long-term implications for the planet. Only by doing so can the country truly contribute to global efforts in combating climate change.

Categories
Coal Energy Gas News Oil

Natural Gas Continues to Lead Carbon Emission Reductions in U.S. Power Sector

The latest data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) reveals that natural gas has played a pivotal role in reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the U.S. power sector for the past 17 years. Contrary to assertions made by some activists at COP28 this week, who seek to downplay the significance of natural gas, these findings emphasize its increasing importance in achieving global emission reduction goals.

According to the EIA, natural gas has had nearly twice the impact on CO2 emissions reduction compared to renewable power generation. This fact challenges the narrative that renewable energy sources are solely responsible for driving emissions reductions. While renewable energy has undoubtedly made significant strides in helping decarbonize the power sector, natural gas has consistently played a crucial role.

Natural gas offers a cleaner alternative to more carbon-intensive fuels like coal. Power plants that utilize natural gas produce significantly lower CO2 emissions, as well as fewer harmful pollutants such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. This cleaner-burning fuel has been instrumental in replacing older, less efficient coal-fired power plants, leading to substantial emission reductions.

As the world continues to grapple with the urgency of combating climate change, it is essential to recognize the critical role natural gas plays in transitioning to a low-carbon energy future. Embracing natural gas as part of the energy mix allows for a more balanced and pragmatic approach to reducing emissions.

FAQ:

Q: Are renewable energy sources not important in reducing carbon emissions?
A: Renewable energy sources are indeed crucial in reducing carbon emissions. However, the EIA data emphasizes that natural gas has had nearly double the impact on CO2 emissions reduction compared to renewable power generation.

Q: How does natural gas contribute to reducing carbon emissions?
A: Compared to more carbon-intensive fuels like coal, natural gas produces significantly lower CO2 emissions when used in power generation. Its cleaner-burning properties enable power plants to reduce their carbon footprint.

Q: What other benefits does natural gas offer?
A: In addition to lower CO2 emissions, natural gas also emits fewer harmful pollutants like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. It is a more environmentally friendly alternative to coal and helps improve air quality.

Q: Is natural gas a sustainable energy source in the long term?
A: While natural gas is a fossil fuel, it emits fewer greenhouse gases than coal or oil. However, a transition towards more renewable energy sources will be necessary in the long term to achieve broader sustainability goals.

Categories
Coal Energy News Solar Wind

Developing Countries Urged to Strive for Net-Zero Emissions

A spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has emphasized the importance of developed countries achieving net-zero emissions well before the target date of 2050. This call aims to create space for developing nations to continue their economic growth while also addressing climate change. The spokesperson, Wang Wenbin, reiterated China’s stance that developed countries bear significant responsibility for the current state of climate action and climate finance.

In response to a recent report by the UN Environment Program (UNEP) predicting a rise in global temperatures by 2.5-2.9 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, Wenbin urged developed countries to take the lead in increasing their emission reduction efforts. By reaching net-zero emissions earlier, these countries can contribute to creating room for developing nations to achieve their sustainable development goals.

Highlighting China’s efforts in combating climate change, Wenbin stated that the country has surpassed its climate action goals for 2020 ahead of schedule. China also aims to achieve the world’s greatest reduction in carbon emission intensity, transitioning from carbon peaking to carbon neutrality in just 30 years.

While developed economies have called on China to make more ambitious commitments, particularly in reducing coal-fired power and providing funding for loss and damage, China has shown progress in renewable energy capacity. In the third quarter alone, China added 24.3 GW of solar capacity, 10.5 GW of wind capacity, and 2.5 GW of hydro capacity.

However, China also saw a significant increase in coal-fired generation capacity additions, nearly doubling year on year. This emphasizes the need for continued efforts to transition to cleaner energy sources and reduce reliance on coal. S&P Global Commodity Insights suggests that low average utilization and the potential risks of high fuel price volatility could dampen investor motivation for new coal projects.

FAQ

Why should developed countries achieve net-zero emissions earlier?

Developed countries have historically contributed more to global emissions and bear a greater responsibility in addressing climate change. By achieving net-zero emissions earlier, they can create space for developing countries to continue their economic growth while mitigating the impacts of climate change.

How has China contributed to global climate governance?

China, as a major developing country, has actively participated in global climate governance. It has surpassed its climate action goals ahead of schedule, aiming for the world’s greatest reduction in carbon emission intensity. China also plans to transition to carbon neutrality within 30 years.

What is the significance of China’s coal-fired power additions?

China’s increase in coal-fired generation capacity highlights the ongoing challenge of transitioning away from coal and adopting cleaner energy sources. However, China has also made progress in renewable energy capacity, such as solar, wind, and hydro.

(Source: S&P Global)

Categories
Coal Energy Georgia Green Energy News Ohio Pennsylvania Solar Texas

Solar Company Secures $1.9 Billion Funding for American-Made Projects

SB Energy Global, a solar company backed by SoftBank Group and Ares Management, has recently obtained $1.9 billion in financing for its upcoming projects. What sets these projects apart is their qualification for federal tax credits tied to the purchase of components made in America. This marks a significant milestone in boosting domestic manufacturing and green energy, thanks to the tax incentives provided by President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act.

To meet the requirements for the tax credits, SB Energy Global has carefully established a domestic supply chain. They have sourced solar modules from a First Solar Inc. factory in Ohio, steel from Texas and Georgia, and sun-tracking devices from various states, including Pennsylvania. By avoiding the need for customs and shipping from Asia, the company can better manage its supply chain, sidestepping potential delays and cost overruns.

The growing preference for domestically made solar panels began even before the Inflation Reduction Act. Supply chain disruptions during the pandemic and concerns regarding solar components made overseas, due to tariffs implemented during the Trump era and allegations of forced labor in China, have prompted US companies to seek equipment made within the country. SB Energy’s projects exemplify the shape-shifting American solar supply chain.

To qualify for an additional 10% tax credit, projects must satisfy a “domestic content” requirement. Another 10% tax credit is available for projects situated in “energy communities,” which encompass regions with fossil fuel activities, high unemployment rates, or decommissioned coal mines or coal-fired plants. These tax credits are calculated based on project costs.

SB Energy Global received support from JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and Truist Bank for its Texas solar projects. All of these projects meet the requirements for the energy community tax credits, while three also qualify for the domestic content credit. Google, through its parent company Alphabet Inc., has agreed to purchase approximately 75% of the generated energy to power their data centers in Texas.

FAQ:

Q: What is the significance of SB Energy Global securing financing for American-made projects?
A: SB Energy Global’s funding represents a milestone in qualifying for federal tax credits tied to purchasing components made in America, boosting domestic manufacturing and green energy.

Q: What are the criteria for the additional tax credits?
A: projects must satisfy a “domestic content” requirement and can receive an additional tax credit by locating in designated “energy communities.”

Q: Who supported SB Energy Global’s Texas solar projects?
A: JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and Truist Bank provided backing, including tax-equity funding.

Q: How much power will the Texas solar projects produce, and who will be the major buyer?
A: The projects are expected to generate 1.3 gigawatts of power, with Alphabet Inc.’s Google purchasing about 75% of the energy to power its Texas data centers.

Categories
Coal Energy Gas News Oil

Is the Oil Industry Holding Back Climate Negotiations?

New concerns have arisen about the role of the oil industry in climate negotiations as the United Nations Conference of Parties (COP28) gets underway in Dubai. Pressure is mounting on Sultan al-Jaber, the CEO of United Arab Emirates national oil company ADNOC, who is also the newly appointed president of COP28.

Reports have surfaced, revealing that ADNOC has been actively pushing for increased fossil fuel sales, even as global efforts to combat climate change intensify. This has raised questions about the conflicting interests of al-Jaber, who is simultaneously tasked with finding solutions to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

The use of coal, oil, and gas is widely recognized as one of the leading causes of global warming. As the world continues to grapple with record-breaking heat waves and extreme weather events, it becomes increasingly important to transition to cleaner energy sources.

At the heart of the issue is the need for transparency and a clear commitment to reducing carbon emissions. Critics argue that the oil industry’s influence on climate negotiations may hinder progress towards effective climate policies. It is crucial for decision-makers to prioritize the long-term health of the planet over short-term economic gains.

To address this concern, the COP28 president must take decisive action to clarify his stance on fossil fuel sales and emphasize the need for a sustainable future. The success of the climate negotiations depends on the willingness of all parties involved to make necessary sacrifices in the interest of the planet.

FAQ:

Q: Why is there concern about the role of the oil industry in climate negotiations?
A: The oil industry’s emphasis on fossil fuel sales contradicts efforts to combat climate change.

Q: What are the chief causes of global warming?
A: The burning of coal, oil, and gas are the main contributors to global warming.

Q: What is the key issue regarding the oil industry’s involvement in climate negotiations?
A: There is a potential conflict of interest between promoting fossil fuel sales and finding solutions to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

Q: What is needed to ensure progress in climate negotiations?
A: It is crucial to prioritize transparency, reduce carbon emissions, and strive for a sustainable future.

Categories
California Coal Energy Gas News Utah

New Legislation Threatens Utah’s Municipal Power Systems

Utah’s municipal power systems are facing a significant challenge as legislators push for new legislation that could have detrimental effects on the governance of the Intermountain Power Project (IPP). Under this proposed bill, legislators would take control of the power system, potentially jeopardizing the reliability and affordability of electricity for thousands of residents.

The Intermountain Power Agency (IPA), organized under Utah’s Interlocal Cooperation Act, has been successfully overseeing the IPP since 1977. This project has allowed 23 Utah cities and their 350,000 residents to partner with major California cities, ensuring a stable and cost-effective supply of electricity. However, some politicians are aiming to interfere with IPA’s private business arrangements and force the continued use of Utah coal, despite its declining economic and environmental viability.

It is crucial to recognize the significant benefits that the IPP has brought to both Utah and California. The project has generated billions of dollars in tax revenue, benefiting Millard County and supporting essential public services. Furthermore, Utah taxpayers have not incurred any financial burden as a result of this venture.

The push to prioritize Utah coal interests over the long-term sustainability of the power system is a misguided approach. Coal is an increasingly outdated and environmentally harmful source of energy. IPA has already made plans to transition away from coal, investing in reconfiguring the power plant to utilize natural gas and hydrogen instead. This transition is expected to be completed by 2025, ensuring a more sustainable and cleaner energy future.

The proposed legislation poses a significant risk to Utah’s municipal power systems and their customers, including cities like Bountiful. These systems rely on a diverse mix of power resources to meet the demand and stabilize electricity prices. Disrupting the current governance structure and forcing continued reliance on coal could lead to higher costs, decreased reliability, and environmental consequences.

It is crucial for lawmakers to consider the long-term implications of their decisions on Utah’s energy landscape. Instead of clinging to outdated energy sources, prioritizing investments in renewable energy and supporting the transition towards cleaner alternatives will provide greater benefits for both Utah and its residents.

FAQ:

Q: What is the Intermountain Power Project (IPP)?
The Intermountain Power Project (IPP) is a collaborative effort between several Utah cities and major California cities to generate electricity. It is organized under the governance of the Intermountain Power Agency (IPA) and has been operating since 1977.

Q: Why are legislators trying to take over the governance of the IPP?
Some legislators are pushing for legislation that would give them control over the IPP. Their motivations appear to be driven by a desire to prioritize the use of Utah coal, despite its declining economic and environmental viability.

Q: What are the potential consequences of this legislation?
If this proposed legislation is enacted, it could disrupt the current governance structure of the IPP and force continued reliance on coal. This could lead to increased costs, decreased reliability, and environmental consequences for Utah’s municipal power systems and their customers.

Categories
Coal News Virginia West Virginia

Bens Creek Announces Partnership Agreement with Avani Resources for the Delivery of High Vol B Metallurgical Coal

Bens Creek, a prominent coal mining company based in West Virginia, has recently secured an agreement with Avani Resources, its largest shareholder, for the delivery of three unit trains filled with 33,000 short tons of Bens Creek High Vol B Metallurgical coal. This move signals a significant development in the ongoing collaboration between the two companies.

According to Bens Creek, the delivery of the coal is expected to be completed by the end of January 2024. In addition to their existing business operations, this sale will contribute to the growth and success of the company. The terms of the agreement dictate that Avani Resources will pay a price aligned with the current market rates for the sale and purchase of High Vol B coal. This is in line with a non-exclusive sales and marketing agreement previously signed by both parties back in July.

While the original article featured a direct quote from Adam Wilson, Bens Creek’s Chief Executive, describing the excitement surrounding this trade with Avani Resources, it is worth noting that this fresh partnership signifies a significant milestone for both companies. The collaboration not only highlights Avani Resources’ ongoing commitment to supporting Bens Creek but also positions the two companies for a prosperous future together.

As the partnership progresses, Bens Creek and Avani Resources anticipate further opportunities for collaboration that will strengthen their respective positions in the coal market. This partnership is a testament to the value of strategic alliances in the mining industry, emphasizing the importance of mutually beneficial relationships and the potential for long-term success.

FAQs

1. What is High Vol B Metallurgical coal?

High Vol B Metallurgical coal refers to a specific type of coal with high carbon content, making it suitable for use in the production of steel and other metallurgical processes.

2. How does this agreement benefit Bens Creek and Avani Resources?

The partnership agreement allows Bens Creek to secure a sale of their High Vol B Metallurgical coal to Avani Resources, ensuring a steady stream of revenue and supporting their ongoing business operations. For Avani Resources, this partnership represents a continued investment in Bens Creek and an opportunity to obtain high-quality coal for their own business ventures.

3. Are there any plans for future collaboration between Bens Creek and Avani Resources?

Yes, both companies anticipate further collaboration and a fruitful partnership in the future. They aim to identify additional opportunities that will strengthen their presence in the coal market and contribute to mutual success.